Compare/Reka Flash 3 vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash

Reka Flash 3vsQwen3.5 Omni Flash

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Reka AI

Reka Flash 3

Input
$0.2/M
Output
$0.8/M
Speed
TTFT
Alibaba

Qwen3.5 Omni Flash

Input
$0.1/M
Output
$0.8/M
Speed
255 tok/s
TTFT
1.84s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Lower Latency
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Benchmarks (0-1)
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash

Pricing Comparison

MetricReka Flash 3Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Input ($/M tokens)$0.2$0.1
Output ($/M tokens)$0.8$0.8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Reka Flash 3$0.28
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash$0.18

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Reka Flash 3
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
255 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Reka Flash 3
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
1.84s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Qwen3.5 Omni Flash takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Qwen3.5 Omni Flash makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Reka Flash 3 is strongest on Intelligence Index (3.7). Qwen3.5 Omni Flash leads on Intelligence Index (19.2).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Reka AI and Alibaba sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Reka AI tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Alibaba often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Reka Flash 3 costs $18.00 ($216/year); Qwen3.5 Omni Flash costs $15.00 ($180/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Reka Flash 3 ≈ $2.60/run, Qwen3.5 Omni Flash ≈ $2.10/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Reka Flash 3 ≈ $120/run, Qwen3.5 Omni Flash ≈ $100/run. Qwen3.5 Omni Flash becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
3.719.2
Coding Index
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Reka Flash 30 wins
1 winsQwen3.5 Omni Flash

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Reka Flash 3 or Qwen3.5 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.28/M tokens vs $0.35/M for Reka Flash 3.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3.5 Omni Flash wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Reka Flash 3. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.5 Omni Flash generates tokens faster at 255 tok/s vs — tok/s. However, Qwen3.5 Omni Flash has lower time-to-first-token (1.84s vs —s).

When should I use Reka Flash 3 vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 Omni Flash for lower cost, Qwen3.5 Omni Flash for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 Omni Flash for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.