Compare/Reka Flash (Sep '24) vs Mercury 2

Reka Flash (Sep '24)vsMercury 2

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Reka AI

Reka Flash (Sep '24)

Input
$0.2/M
Output
$0.8/M
Speed
85 tok/s
TTFT
1.24s
Inception

Mercury 2

Input
$0.25/M
Output
$0.75/M
Speed
907 tok/s
TTFT
3.76s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
Faster (tok/s)
Mercury 2
Lower Latency
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
Benchmarks (1-7)
Mercury 2

Pricing Comparison

MetricReka Flash (Sep '24)Mercury 2
Input ($/M tokens)$0.2$0.25
Output ($/M tokens)$0.8$0.75
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Reka Flash (Sep '24)$0.28
Mercury 2$0.33

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
85 tok/s
Mercury 2
907 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
1.24s
Mercury 2
3.76s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
12.032.8
Coding Index
30.6
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
77.0%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
52.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
15.5%
SciCode
38.7%
IFBench
69.8%
TerminalBench
26.5%
Reka Flash (Sep '24)1 wins
7 winsMercury 2

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Reka Flash (Sep '24) or Mercury 2?

Reka Flash (Sep '24) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.35/M tokens vs $0.38/M for Mercury 2.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Mercury 2 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Reka Flash (Sep '24). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Mercury 2 generates tokens faster at 907 tok/s vs 85 tok/s. Reka Flash (Sep '24) also has lower time-to-first-token (1.24s vs 3.76s).

When should I use Reka Flash (Sep '24) vs Mercury 2?

Choose based on your priorities: Reka Flash (Sep '24) for lower cost, Mercury 2 for stronger benchmark performance, and Mercury 2 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.