Compare/Solar Mini vs Llama 3 Instruct 8B

Solar MinivsLlama 3 Instruct 8B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Upstage

Solar Mini

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
TTFT
Meta

Llama 3 Instruct 8B

Input
$0.04/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Llama 3 Instruct 8B
Faster (tok/s)
Lower Latency
Benchmarks (1-0)
Solar Mini

Pricing Comparison

MetricSolar MiniLlama 3 Instruct 8B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.15$0.04
Output ($/M tokens)$0.15$0.14
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Solar Mini$0.16
Llama 3 Instruct 8B$0.05

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Solar Mini wins the overall benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.1× the per-million-token cost, Llama 3 Instruct 8B is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Llama 3 Instruct 8B makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Solar Mini is strongest on Intelligence Index (6.0). Llama 3 Instruct 8B leads on Intelligence Index (1.0).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Upstage and Meta sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Upstage tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Meta often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Solar Mini costs $6.75 ($81/year); Llama 3 Instruct 8B costs $3.30 ($40/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Solar Mini ≈ $1.05/run, Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $0.48/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Solar Mini ≈ $45/run, Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $22/run. Llama 3 Instruct 8B becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
6.01.0
Coding Index
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Solar Mini1 wins
0 winsLlama 3 Instruct 8B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Solar Mini or Llama 3 Instruct 8B?

Llama 3 Instruct 8B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.07/M tokens vs $0.15/M for Solar Mini.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Solar Mini wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Llama 3 Instruct 8B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Solar Mini vs Llama 3 Instruct 8B?

Choose based on your priorities: Llama 3 Instruct 8B for lower cost, Solar Mini for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.