Compare/Solar Pro 3 vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)

Solar Pro 3vsMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Upstage

Solar Pro 3

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.6/M
Speed
152 tok/s
TTFT
2.38s
Mistral

Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.6/M
Speed
160 tok/s
TTFT
0.80s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Lower Latency
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Benchmarks (0-2)
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricSolar Pro 3Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.15$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0.6$0.6
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Solar Pro 3$0.21
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)$0.21

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Solar Pro 3
152 tok/s
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
160 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Solar Pro 3
2.38s
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
0.80s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Solar Pro 3 is strongest on Coding Index (16.2), Intelligence Index (14.5). Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) leads on Coding Index (26.6), Intelligence Index (19.7).

Speed. Throughput is comparable — 152 tok/s vs 160 tok/s — so generation speed shouldn't drive your choice here. Look at the per-benchmark wins instead.

Provider. Upstage and Mistral sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Upstage tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Mistral often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Solar Pro 3 costs $13.50 ($162/year); Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) costs $13.50 ($162/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Solar Pro 3 ≈ $1.95/run, Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) ≈ $1.95/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Solar Pro 3 ≈ $90/run, Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) ≈ $90/run.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
14.519.7
Coding Index
16.226.6
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Solar Pro 30 wins
2 winsMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Solar Pro 3 or Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Solar Pro 3. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 160 tok/s vs 152 tok/s. However, Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.80s vs 2.38s).

When should I use Solar Pro 3 vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.