Compare/Step 3.7 Flash vs o3

Step 3.7 Flashvso3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

StepFun

Step 3.7 Flash

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

o3

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
124 tok/s
TTFT
6.22s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Step 3.7 Flash
Faster (tok/s)
o3
Lower Latency
Step 3.7 Flash
Benchmarks (1-11)
o3

Pricing Comparison

MetricStep 3.7 Flasho3
Input ($/M tokens)$0$2
Output ($/M tokens)$0$8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Step 3.7 Flash$0.00
o3$2.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Step 3.7 Flash
o3
124 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Step 3.7 Flash
o3
6.22s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
42.638.4
Coding Index
37.138.4
Math Index
88.3
GPQA Diamond
80.9%82.7%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
AIME 2025
88.3%
MATH-500
99.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
19.9%20.0%
SciCode
40.0%41.0%
IFBench
67.3%71.4%
TerminalBench
35.6%37.1%
Step 3.7 Flash1 wins
11 winso3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Step 3.7 Flash or o3?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $3.50/M for o3.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o3 wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Step 3.7 Flash. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3 generates tokens faster at 124 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Step 3.7 Flash also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 6.22s).

When should I use Step 3.7 Flash vs o3?

Choose based on your priorities: Step 3.7 Flash for lower cost, o3 for stronger benchmark performance, and o3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.