Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking | GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.235 | $0.3 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.875 | $0.9 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.40/M tokens vs $0.45/M for GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning).
Trinity Large Thinking wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Trinity Large Thinking generates tokens faster at 118 tok/s vs 22 tok/s. Trinity Large Thinking also has lower time-to-first-token (0.59s vs 4.45s).
Choose based on your priorities: Trinity Large Thinking for lower cost, Trinity Large Thinking for stronger benchmark performance, and Trinity Large Thinking for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.