Compare/Trinity Large Thinking vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)

Trinity Large ThinkingvsGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Arcee AI

Trinity Large Thinking

Input
$0.235/M
Output
$0.875/M
Speed
118 tok/s
TTFT
0.59s
Z AI

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)

Input
$0.3/M
Output
$0.9/M
Speed
28 tok/s
TTFT
1.18s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Trinity Large Thinking
Faster (tok/s)
Trinity Large Thinking
Lower Latency
Trinity Large Thinking
Benchmarks (7-4)
Trinity Large Thinking

Pricing Comparison

MetricTrinity Large ThinkingGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.235$0.3
Output ($/M tokens)$0.875$0.9
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Trinity Large Thinking$0.32
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)$0.39

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Trinity Large Thinking
118 tok/s
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)
28 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Trinity Large Thinking
0.59s
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)
1.18s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
31.923.4
Coding Index
27.219.7
Math Index
85.3
GPQA Diamond
75.2%71.9%
MMLU-Pro
79.9%
LiveCodeBench
16.0%
AIME 2025
85.3%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
14.7%8.9%
SciCode
36.1%30.4%
IFBench
56.3%30.1%
TerminalBench
22.7%14.4%
Trinity Large Thinking7 wins
4 winsGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.40/M tokens vs $0.45/M for GLM-4.6V (Reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Trinity Large Thinking wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for GLM-4.6V (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Trinity Large Thinking generates tokens faster at 118 tok/s vs 28 tok/s. Trinity Large Thinking also has lower time-to-first-token (0.59s vs 1.18s).

When should I use Trinity Large Thinking vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Trinity Large Thinking for lower cost, Trinity Large Thinking for stronger benchmark performance, and Trinity Large Thinking for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.